Kwame Opoku

Did Germans Never Hear Directly or Indirectly Nigeria’s Demand for Return of Looted Artefacts?

Benin Bronze

“The restitution of those cultural objects which our museums and collections, directly or indirectly, possess thanks to the colonial system and are now being demanded, must also not be postponed with cheap arguments and tricks.”

Gert v. Paczensky and Herbert Ganslmayr, Nofretete will nach Hause (1)

In discussions on restitution of cultural objects to their countries of origin, we often hear very strange and abstruse arguments from the holders but I must confess I was not prepared for the explanation that came from the Berlin government in answer to a parliamentary question from the German Green Party, in the context of the discussions on the proposed project, Humboldt Forum. This project would involve transferring the ethnological objects, including the looted/stolen ones, from the Ethnologisches Museum, Dahlem, to the centre of Berlin in a new gigantic building now under construction. (2)

The Berlin government of the ruling Social Democratic party declared:

“So far no demand for restitution from either the former Kingdom of Benin or the successor State Nigeria has either directly or indirectly been made to the Federal Government or to the Foundation Preussischer Kulturbesitz.. (3)

This astonishing and arrogant statement from the Berlin government is singular in its audacity and flies in the face of history and veracity. What it tries to do, rather boldly, is to deny all the discussions on the Benin artefacts since the notorious invasion of Benin in 1897 by the British and the demands of the peoples of the former Benin Kingdom under the leadership of the present Oba and the Government of Nigeria. We would not want to recount all the innumerable demands made by both the Oba of Benin and the various Nigerian governments. There have been in the last few years many meetings and discussions on the restitution of Benin bronzes in most of which German museum authorities participated, such as the recent meetings in Benin City on 19th and 29th February 2013 which issued the so-called Benin Plan of Action on Restitution. (4) The Ethnology Museum, Berlin and the Museum für Völkerkunde, Dresden, participated in this meeting. Are we to understand that the Berlin Government has not been informed directly or indirectly about such meetings and the demands of the Nigerians?

On the question of restitution of cultural artefacts, there has been an incredible play being acted over and over again. When Nigerians and other Africans ask for the return of their cultural objects, there is silence or denial. After a while, the holders declare that nobody has ever asked them to return the items. The Africans ask again and there is silence or further denial. How long will this play go on? The hypocrisy, lies and disrespect are beyond belief. Various international bodies such as the United Nations and UNESCO have recommended returning these objects but Western States and their museums seem not to pay any attention. They should not be surprised if other States follow their non-compliant practice in other areas.


Whether the Berlin Government is aware or not, a Nigerian Minister of Culture went to Berlin in 2008 to carry the demands of the Nigerian peoples and Government in what was called Berlin Plea for the return of Nigeria’s cultural objects. (5) How far must Nigerians carry their demand before the Berlin Government hears it, if bringing the message to Berlin it is still not enough to make it audible directly or indirectly, for the Berlin Government to notice?

At the opening of the exhibition Benin: Kings and Rituals – Court Arts from Nigeria in 2008 in Berlin, the then Nigerian Minister of Tourism, Culture and National Orientation, Prince Adetokumbo Kayode made a clear demand for the restitution of the Benin objects:

I wish to appeal to the conscience of all as the BERLIN PLEA OF RETURN OF NIGERIA’S CULTURAL OBJECTS that while Nigeria prepares itself and perhaps Africa prepares an official request for the return of its stolen artifacts, those hearts that are touched by that reckless act of colonization should on their own return all or part of the objects in their collection to Nigeria and Africa. It should not be seen as another declaration of war but a passionate plea”. (6)

Prince Adetokumbo Kayode explained further the significance of Berlin in this matter:

There is this coincidence of history in this great city by the presence of this exhibition. Berlin was the meeting place for the partitioning of Africa in 1884 (the scramble for Africa). It was here that the instrument of colonization was first hatched. African nations were then vulnerable and very week.  They were recovering from the ravages of the Slave Trade.  Africa had no voice in the partitioning of its land by the powerful countries of the time. It was an unbalanced equation in the theatre of war. The Berlin Conference led to and gave muscle to the plunder of African colonies and hence Benin Kingdom”.

The Minister underlined the significant role of the looted Benin bronzes and the need for a healing process between the countries responsible for the loot or retention of the Benin bronzes and other African cultural objects, and the victims of these aggressions:

This exhibition presents the soul of our Nation, the pages of history that were torn away violently, the emblems and insignia of power and authority and the source of inspiration to our country.  I hope that this appeal shall be taken in good faith, in brotherhood, love for one another and in bridging gaps between the rich and powerful countries of the world and the weak. It is a way of reaching out to the once oppressed and wounded with the view that there can be a new healing process in the world where we live to share and play responsible roles. This process of voluntary return will go a long way to correct the ills of the past and heal the wounds of colonization”.

But long before Prince Kayode, the great Ekpo Eyo and others had been trying to secure the return of  a few Benin bronzes and had sent messages to the embassies of all holders in Lagos:

“By the end of the 1960s, the price of Benin works had soared so high that the Federal Government of Nigeria was in no mood to contemplate buying them. When, therefore a National Museum was planned for Benin City in 1968, we were faced with the problem of finding exhibits that would be shown to reflect the position that Benin holds in the world of art history. A few unimportant objects which were kept in the old local authority museum in Benin were transferred to the new museum and a few more objects were brought in from Lagos. Still the museum was ‘empty’. We tried using casts and photographs to fill gaps but the desired effect was unachievable. We therefore thought of making an appeal to the world for loans or return of some works so that Benin might also be to show its own works at least to its own people. We tabled a draft resolution at the General Assembly of the International Council of Museums (ICOM) which met in France in 1968, appealing for donations of one or two pieces from those museums which have large stocks of Benin works. The resolution was modified to make it read like a general appeal for restitution or return and then adopted. When we returned to Nigeria, we circulated the adopted resolution to the embassies and high commissions of countries we know to have large Benin holdings but up till now we have received no reaction from any quarters and the Benin Museum stays ‘empty’,” (7)

Did the German embassy in Lagos not forward the note from Ekpo to the government in Berlin? We have known of secretaries throwing into wastepaper basket important documents in order to reduce the load of materials to be filed but would a German embassy act in this way?

The Nigerian Parliament asked President Obasanjo in 2002 to request the return of artefacts taken away during the colonial era (8) But would the government of a city that has been at the centre of many international disputes ever read or listen to what other governments were saying or for that matter what the media had been reporting?

Benin3The Oba of Benin sent his brother in 2000 to bring the request for the return of the Benin bronzes to the British Parliament which has become an important document in history and is known as Appendix 21. It is true that the document was addressed directly to the British as being primarily responsible for the Benin invasion and hence for the dispersal of the precious artefacts. But would the German government not hear about this and take notice of the intention and desire of the Oba of Benin? (9)

If the Berlin authorities have not, directly or indirectly received the demand of the Nigerian, then they must look carefully into their system of communication of information. In the last few years, the demand for the return of the Benin bronzes has been repeated at every Benin exhibition and we can confirm that German museums and other institutions were well represented.

At the opening of the Benin exhibition Benin:Kings And Rituals – Court Arts from Nigeria on 8 May 2007, in the Museum für Völkerkunde, Vienna, the Benin Royal delegation made it absolutely clear in their statement that they wanted their art objects back in Benin. Prince G.I. Akenzua, Enogie of Evbuobanosa, brother of the Oba, elaborated further this demand during his lecture entitled, The Loss of Benin Artworks and their Original Function at the International Symposium which took place on 9th and 10th May 2007 in the Museum für Völkerkunde. There ensued a debate over restitution where Prof. C. Feest, then Director of the Völkerkunde Museum Vienna, repeated the usual western arguments against the restitution of the Benin artefacts. We promptly and unambiguously rejected the baseless arguments. (10)

But even before the opening of the exhibition, the Oba of Benin had expressed in an introductory note to the catalogue of the exhibition the desire of his people to have their artefacts back:

The exhibition is showcasing some of the works that made Benin (Nigeria) famous. It once again, reminds the world of a civilization truncated by the imperial forces of the colonialist. The works on show at this exhibition are some of the 3000 odd pieces of bronze and ivory works forcibly removed from my great grandfather’s palace by some Britons who invaded Benin in 1897. The British kept some of the loot for themselves and sold the rest to European and American buyers. These works now adorn public museums and private collector’s galleries, all over the world.

“We are pleased to participate in this exhibition. It links us, nostalgically, with our past. As you put this past on show today, it is our prayer that the people and government of Austria will show humaneness and magnanimity and return to us some of these objects which found their way to your country.” (11)

The modest request of the Oba of Benin to have back some of the looted artefacts was promptly rejected in an arrogant and Eurocentric perspective in the preface of the same catalogue by the directors of the museums that organized the exhibition with Nigeria. The Preface was signed by Prof. Christian Feest, Director, Museum für Völkerkunde Wien, Jean-Pierre Mohen, Director, patrimoine et collections, musée du quai Branly, Paris, Dr.Viola Koenig, Director, Ethnologisches Museum, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and James Cuno, President and Eloise W.Martin Director, The Art Institute of Chicago. 

It is clear from the rejection by the museum directors that the demand by the Oba was directed to all the Western holders of the looted bronzes and not only Austria. How come then that the authorities in Berlin can now in 2013 declare they have not been directly or indirectly approached by the Oba or the Nigerian authorities?

The Director-General of the National Commission of Museums and Monuments, Yusuf Abdallah Usman has multiplied recently the request for the return of Nigerian artefacts from abroad:

“For the avoidance of doubt, we hereby place it on record that we demand, as we have always done, the return of these looted artworks and all stolen, removed or looted artefacts from Nigeria under whatever guise”. (12)

We submit that the request by the Oba of Benin for the return of some of the looted Benin bronzes in the catalogue of the exhibition constitutes a direct request to the German museums and the German government represented at the opening of the exhibition and to those who were not there. The demand made at the symposium by the brother of the Oba is also to be considered as a direct request to all holders of  Benin bronzes. The disrespect of a reigning monarch by Western museums and governments cannot be accepted as sufficient for declaring such requests, made in writing or to the hearing of representatives and scholars, as non-existent and  should not be allowed to negate such clear and direct expressions of will.

Benin 4The declaration by the Berlin authorities that they have not been directly or indirectly approached with a demand for restitution by the Oba of Benin or the Nigerian government is based on a basic assumption that a person or entity that has lost property must submit a request to the holder of the property. In other words that in the absence of such a request the Germans cannot return the Benin bronzes.

Readers will no doubt be well aware of the farcical games played with the Egyptians regarding the demand of the restitution of Nefertiti. (13)

But is there such a rule under International Law or Municipal Law that would prevent the Germans and other Western States from returning the Benin artefacts in the absence of a demand? (14)

The United Nations General Assembly has since 1972 requested Member States in several resolutions to return cultural objects which were taken away during the colonial daysThe restitution of cultural objects to the countries of origin has become a permanent agenda item. In its resolution entitled Return or restitution of cultural property to its country of origin” of 4 December 2006, (A/RES/61/52,) the General Assembly reiterated the importance of restitution to these countries and called on all bodies of the United Nations and UNESCO as well as Member States ‘to continue to address the issue of return or restitution of cultural property to the countries of origin and to provide appropriate support accordingly’. (15) All these resolutions have not moved any of the western countries that hold illegal or stolen cultural objects.

Several international conferences have also urged the return of artefacts. For example, the UNESCO International Conference, The Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin, Athens, 17-18 March, 2008 urged museums to initiate dialogues on the return of important cultural property to the country and community of origin. (16)

Clearly, the refusal to return stolen cultural property violates the right to culture and right of access to culture as provided for in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (I966) and the International Covenant on Civic and Political Rights (1966) in so far as the deprivation of a whole people or community of its cultural objects renders it impossible for the individuals in that community to exercise rights guaranteed under the international instruments. Indeed some acts of refusal to return cultural objects, such as crosses or other religious symbols must be considered as violations of religious freedom. The religious and ritual objects of the Edo are necessary if they are to follow their tradition and religion. It is remarkable that some States that pride themselves of their religion as part of their culture and even require immigrants to adopt  these values do not seem worried by the thought that they are preventing others from following and cultivating their traditional and religious values.

Benin 5Western museums have not been enthusiastic to help in repatriating looted artefacts such as the Benin bronzes because of their complicity with colonial interventions and looting, Ana Filipa Vrdoljak has rightly declared:

“The history of museums shows that these institutions have facilitated, justified and benefited from colonialism and related policies of discrimination, assimilation and genocide. They have also often served to inform and engage broader societal concerns. The present-day ‘commitment to righten historic wrongs’ by former metropolitan powers and their museums must include restitution claims of indigenous and other colonised peoples. Museums must be actively involved in reversing and ameliorating the ongoing effects of these policies and practices”.(17)

The Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970)considers in its preamble that “cultural property constitutes one of the basic elements of civilization and national culture, and that its true value can be appreciated only in relation to the fullest possible information regarding its origin, history and traditional setting” and states that “as cultural institutions, museums, libraries and archives should ensure that their collections are built up in accordance with universally recognized moral principles”. (18)

The ICOM (International Council of Museums) Code of Ethics for Museums, 2006, which sets minimum standards for museums and their staff, provides as follows, regarding return of cultural property:

6.1 Co-operation

Museums should promote the sharing of knowledge, documentation and collections with museums and cultural organisations in the countries and communities of origin. The possibility of developing partnerships with museums in countries or areas that have lost a significant part of their heritage should be explored.

6.2 Return of Cultural property

Museums should be prepared to initiate dialogues for the return of cultural property to a country or people of origin. This should be undertaken in an impartial manner, based on scientific, professional and humanitarian principles as well as applicable local, national and international legislation, in preference to action at a governmental or political level.

6.3 Restitution of Cultural property

When a country or people of origin seeks the restitution of an object or specimen that can be demonstrated to have been exported or otherwise transferred in violation of the principles of international and national conventions, and shown to be part of that country’s or people’s cultural or natural heritage, the museum concerned should, if legally free to do so, take prompt and responsible steps to cooperate in its return. (19) 

In view of the above, it is our considered opinion that the lack of a formal/official request is no ground for the holding State and its institutions for not initiating a process of restitution or for refusing to return stolen cultural property. On the contrary there is a positive duty on museums holding looted/stolen/seized cultural items to start discussing their return, whether there is a formal/official request or not.

Therefore, the declaration that the Berlin authorities have not been approached directly or indirectly by either the Oba of Benin or the Nigerian authorities, cannot be accepted as an excuse for not returning or discussing the return of the cultural objects to the Oba of Benin.

Notwithstanding the above observations, we have suggested that Nigerian authorities write directly to museums with large collections of Benin artefacts in order to prevent the holders of looted artefacts from saying that there has not been any demand, an easy but unconvincing argument. The argument demonstrates beyond all reasonable doubt the unwillingness of the holder to envisage restitution. This position strengthens the determination of the holder not to consider the issue of restitution on its merits by blocking the demand at its very first step.

The Oba of Benin sent in 2009 letters hand-carried to the board of trustees of the Art Institute of Chicago and to the Field Museum,Chicago, requesting restitution of some Benin artefacts. Until today, there has not even been an acknowledgement of receipt from both institutions. Such is the conduct of those allegedly promoting understanding between different cultures of the world.


The statement by the Berlin authorities takes a well-known second line of defence that argues that Germany acquired the Benin bronzes legally and therefore has no obligation to return them to the Oba of Benin.

There is no need here to recount the full story of the notorious bloody invasion of Benin in 1897 by the British army and the subsequent looting of the cultural artefacts. (20)

In answer to the question whether the Government considered as legal and legitimate the many Benin bronzes that the British looted in their invasion of Benin in 1897 and are now in the Ethnologisches Museum, Berlin, which the Benin people are seeking to recoverthe government answered as follows

A greater part of the 507 objects that constitute the Benin-Collection of the Ethnologisches Museum was acquired between 1897 and 1925 from the art market in London, and partly in Lagos. The Government and the  Foundation Preussischer Kulturbesitz are of the view that these objects were legally acquired and that there is no  International Law basis for demands for restitution”(21)

As we have already discussed above the government stated that there had been no demands for restitution from the Oba or the Nigerian authorities.

The assertion that the Germans acquired legally the Benin bronzes that had been looted by the British in their notorious invasion of Benin in 1897 must not be accepted without discussion as to the alleged “legality”. As has been correctly stated above, the British sold the looted artefacts in London, on open market. The Germans were very enthusiastic purchasers of the Benin bronzes and indeed it was the German acquisition of various objects that prompted British institutions to increase their own stock. (22) The then director of the Ethnologisches Museum Berlin, Felix von Luschan had been one of the first to recognize the excellent workmanship that had gone to produce those artefacts.(23) Luschan had even advocated the use of force in acquiring cultural objects from peoples the European ethnologists considered to be condemned to disappear from the face of the earth. This racist conception which existed in German intellectual tradition and was present in the atrocities in Namibia continued its trajectory under Nazi rule in Germany and elsewhere.

With racist theories of European superiority and doubts whether Africans were human beings with intelligence, the British invasion of Benin was certainly not regretted by people like von Luschan and even long after his time, one seldom hears any expressions of regret by Europeans regarding the killings of thousands of Benin people (Edo). This is in contrast to regrets and apologies rendered in the case of victims of Nazi atrocities and aggressions.

Austrians, Germans and others who obtained Benin Bronzes from the British must be considered as not having any valid title to the artefacts they hold. In any case, the law of Benin never authorized the seizure of the Oba’s property. Benin being the place of the pretended acquisition by the British, the law of Benin

should govern the act of acquisition. Many have discussed this issue as if there were no laws in Benin in 1897 that would forbid such patent violation of rights in property. Joseph Egharevba, leading authority on Benin history and laws, states in his classic work, The Benin Laws and Customs (1947) that the person of the Oba is sacred and his property cannot be touched without his consent. He is the source of law and could make and repeal laws. The British of course were not interested in presenting a true picture of Benin society but preferred to depict the kingdom as a land of juju, cannibalism and human sacrifice. But what about others who have discussed this issue? How can they assume implicitly that Benin Law was not relevant, unless they were only concerned with power? But power is not law.

Legality of German purchases of Benin objects presupposes the legality of the British acquisition of the looted objects. The British looted the artefacts during their notorious invasion of Benin City. Does looting of property of others confer legality on the looter? Clearly, no legal system would accept the transfer of proprietary rights in this violent manner. There may be de facto acceptance of this illegality but does the fact that no one can push the looter to return the looted goods confer legality on the violent looter? Some have argued that the law in 1897 authorised a conqueror to take all the cultural artefacts of the defeated. But those arguing this way do not specify which law. Is it English Law, European International Law, from which Africans were excluded, or Benin Law?

benin8After the devastating lootings of Napoleon and his troops in 1815 European International Law clearly regarded looting of cultural artefacts as illegitimate. Vrdoljak has stated:

By mid-1815, there was broad agreement that the French confiscations of cultural objects were contrary to contemporary rules of law and that objects could not remain in Parisian collections.” (24)

Again we have the view expressed by Andy Ho that it was the Congress of Vienna (1815), held after the defeat of France at Waterloo, that settled the illegality of looting works of art in wartime:

The peace treaty explicitly required France to return a very wide range of cultural property to European countries from which they had been looted.

Clearly, then in 1860, when the Anglo-French force invaded Beijing, it had no legal rights under prevailing international law to the antiquities it took”. (25)

Prof, Neil Brodie has written:

“It should be recognized internationally that the Benin artworks were taken forcibly by an imperial power and, following the precedents of 1815 and

1945, that they should be returned. Ownership should be vested with an appropriate authority in Nigeria”. (26)

Whatever may have been the legal position in European International Law, it was clearly not part of African International Law that conquerors could take away the cultural objects of a defeated nation.  In any case, Africans were not considered to be part of European International Law and any rules and practices developed in this respect clearly did not apply to Benin’s cultural objects. Incidentally, there is not one single example of a victorious African army stealing the cultural objects of the defeated and proudly displaying in its country.

Benin law would not have authorized the looting of the Oba’s property since his person is regarded as untouchable and all the property under his care is also protected. The British looting of the Benin bronzes was from a legal point of view illegal and illegitimate. It follows from the above that the looters, the British, could not transfer any proprietary rights to the Germans. They may have paid cash but the objects they allegedly bought were tainted with illegality ab initio. Moreover, the Germans knew very well that the objects they were buying were illegally transferred from Benin City to London. They bought the Benin Bronzes, from a notorious British auctioneer, W.D.Webster who also sold Benin artefacts to Austrians. Indeed the first auction took place a few months after the invasion, in May 1897. Many of the objects the Germans and Austrians bought must have had some of the blood of the people of Benin on them, fresh from the battlefield. Is that what the Berlin government regards as legal acquisition?

The legality of the British “acquisition” by violence, by invading an African country, thousands of miles from Europe, has never been considered by an impartial judiciary system but most honest people will regard such violent action as illegal. Moreover, the Germans who allegedly bought the artefacts from the British could not have legitimately acquired valid rights for lack of bona fides, good faith, “guten Glauben”. In any case, the Germans cannot completely distance or disassociate themselves from the criminal invasion of Benin in 1897. After all, it was the attempt by the British to enforce the division of areas of control or influence which the Germans and the British, with others, had set up in 1885 in Berlin that led to the conflict between the British and Oba Ovonramvem who resisted British attempts to exercise control over Benin. The conflict that eventually led to the looting of the Benin artefacts cannot be seen as a remote consequence of the Berlin Conference but must be accepted as a direct result of that division of areas of control by the Europeans. At the time of the 1885 conference, Africa and the areas the Europeans allocated to themselves were known to be inhabited and it was clear to all that conflicts would ensue.

Contracts of purchase between the Ethnologisches Museum and British dealers should not be treated like ordinary contracts between German tourists and English shopkeepers in Regents Street. The historical context must be seriously considered to give the act of purchase its full significance and meaning.


In answer to the question what meetings had been held with the owners of the Benin bronzes, the Berlin government answered as follows:

“Since 2010 there have been regular meetings between representatives of the King of Benin, the National Commission of Museums and Monuments in Nigeria and various European museums with large Benin collections (London, Vienna, Leiden, Stockholm and Dresden) on the question of treatment of objects from the Kingdom of Benin. The agreed aim of all participants is in the long term to find a possibility to present in Nigeria objects from the Benin collections in Europe. At present, the main emphasis is on the work of documentation of Benin collections in Europe to be placed on the internet as well as the intensification of the cooperation between all the participating museums and institutions”.(27)

Many will be surprised by the statement that the various meetings held since 2010 between the representatives of the Oba of Benin, the National Commission of Museums and Monuments and representatives of European museums at London, Vienna, and Leiden. Stockholm and Dresden, holders of large collections of Benin artefacts, were about documentation of the artefacts; a documentation that would also be placed in the internet and an eventual display of some of the artefacts in Nigeria. Up to now, many had the understanding and the impression that these meetings were about the restitution of at least some of the looted Benin bronzes. Newspaper reports as well as statements from the National Commission had led to the belief that some progress had been made in the direction of restitution. (28)

The explanations of the recent meetings as given by the Berlin government correspond essentially to what happened in the meeting in Benin City. Though the document issued at the end of that meeting was entitled The Benin Plan of Action on Restitution, there was nothing in it that envisaged restitution of the precious Benin artefacts. No wonder that the representative of the Oba declared he would not take part any more in such meetings in future. Besides, the British Museum did not take part in the meeting. (29)


The Berlin government expressed in its response its conviction that the ICOM Code of Ethics forms the basis of the work of the museums in Berlin and that they are aware of their historical and political responsibility in the treatment of acquisitions from the colonial period. (30)

To state that the vast majority of the acquisitions in the Benin collection were made between 1897 and 1925 and then declare that ICOM rules adopted in 1986 form the basis of the work of the museum requires some explanation in order to be convincing. Certainly, the Ethnologisches Museum has not been following the ICOM rules as far as they relate to restitution. As for the important acquisitions of Benin artefacts, they were made before the ICOM Code of Ethics was established. One cannot help feeling that the name of ICOM was thrown into the statement by the Berlin government to secure for the museums a veneer of legitimacy and legality. The statement seeks to create an aura of rectitude around the museum in order to avert criticisms especially from the youth.

If the Berlin museums were really conscious of their historical and political responsibility as regards artefacts acquired in the colonial era, they would not want to be seen arguing with Africans about the return of cultural artefacts that are undoubtedly African.

Benin10The cruelty and unbelievable oppression in German colonies require no elaboration here(31) It was in an atmosphere of excessive oppression that many artefacts were collected from the German colonies. When it is said that many artefacts were given to the museums as gifts by German travellers, it should be remembered that these were objects extracted from Africans who had no choice but to hand over to the Europeans whatever they wanted. In a study entitled “The Position of Africans in the German Colonies’”, Helmut Stoecker declared;

The almost total absence of genuine liberalism among the Germans in the colonies, the grim and obstinate anti-African racism already referred to, and the preference for direct and openly practiced oppression all combined to make a situation possible in which ‘nearly every white man walks around with a whip and almost every white man indulges in striking any black man he chooses to, as Colonial Secretary Bernhard Dernburg discovered in Dar es Salaam in 1907.” (32)

Cornelia Essner has written the following:

That the acquisition of ethnografica in the colonial time was on the basis of more or less “structural violence” will not be pursued in detail in this context. Some individual contemporaries were perfectly aware of this fact. Thus one Africa traveller and resident in the German Empire in Ruanda, Richard Kandt, wrote in 1897 to Felix von Luschan, Deputy Director of the Ethnology Museum, Berlin, as follows; “It is especially difficult to procure an object without at least employing some force. I believe that half of your museum consists of stolen objects.” (33)

We all recollect that Berlin was the place where the imperialist powers of Europe met in 1885 and divided Africa among themselves and thus set in motion a system of government that brought untold suffering on the African peoples. We need only remember Namibia, formerly German colony of South West Africa where the cruelty of German colonial rule exceeded all bounds and stamped Germany with a terrible reputation only surpassed by Nazi Germany. The effects of the oppressive German regime are still felt in Namibia where recently the human remains of those Namibians massacred and brought to Germany have been returned after arduous negotiations. Germany still refuses to apologize or pay compensation. (34)

Given the background of German colonial experience in the collection of artefacts in Africa and the pre-eminent role of the Ethnologisches Museum in this matter and being fully aware of the history of the acquisition of the Benin Bronzes, a Berlin government and its museums should be adopting a different position from what is conveyed by the response to the Green Party. They should be interested in returning at least some of the looted artefacts and seek a reasonable compromise. They would in any case seek to avoid endless discussions on such an issue and endeavour to prevent any impression of continuity in the present and past German practice and ideology with regard to collecting cultural artefacts of others. But can one achieve this and still maintain the loot of the past, albeit via the British?

From the 507 Benin artefacts that the Berlin regime mentioned (although by some counts there should be more, about 580) some 307 for example, could be returned to Benin City; arrangements could be made for lending some of the remaining objects if the Nigerians request. From the answer of the Berlin government, there is no trace of a sense of historical responsibility and moral consciousness. The government is out of tune with the spirit of our times which is to return artefacts wrongly taken away from colonial and other oppressed peoples. Magnus Magnusson has rightly stated:

benin12The German language has the word for it: Zeitgeist. The Zeitgeist, literally, „time spirit“, the attitude or general outlook of a specific time or age; The Zeitgeist of the early twenty-first century where restitution and redemption is concerned is so much more humane than that of the twentieth century”. (35)

The language and stance of the Berlin government appears to be the same as other responses by Western governments to former colonial States and their peoples. The ton and response of the Berlin government correspond to the tenets of the now discredited Declaration on the Importance and Value of  Universal Museums (DIVUM) in so far as the German authorities refuse to envisage the return of any of the Benin bronzes to the people of Benin. They are willing to assist the Nigerians in cataloguing the Benin Bronzes; they are willing to put this catalogue on the internet. What they are not willing to do is to consider the return of any of the 507 objects. German authorities subscribe to the false notion in the discredited Declaration on the Value and Importance of Universal Museum that:

“Over time, objects so acquired – whether by purchase, gift, or partage – have become part of the museums that have cared for them, and by extension part of the heritage of the nations which house them. Today we are especially sensitive to the subject of a work’s original context, but we should not lose sight of the fact that museums too provide a valid and valuable context for objects that were long ago displaced from their original source” (36)

What the Berlin government is saying is that they are not prepared to loosen or give up the political and cultural hegemony that, in line with other Western States, they have established over Africa and Africans. Much of this domination is 500 years old and forms part of a mechanism that allows the West to dictate to Africa in all domains, including culture. These Benin bronzes are largely records and symbols of power and to return them would imply that the West has finally accepted Africans as capable of looking after themselves and not in need of any outside control. Such a concession has never been considered by the West which maintains supremacy even in matters of African art .There are by far better and more African art icons in Europe than in Africa itself. Those, including Africans, who want to study African art, need to go to Europe, to places such as the Ethnologisches Museum, Berlin, to see the African icons. The West is not yet ready to return to Africa the symbols of power seized in colonial and imperialist wars. The West remains symbolically and factually the master of Africa and its destiny. This is the affirmation implicit in the refusal to hear demands for restitution or to consider the possibility of returning any Benin bronze.

If the Berlin museum were operating on the basis of the ICOM Code of Ethics, they would have taken the initiative to meet with representatives of the Oba to discuss the return of the Benin Bronzes as required by rules 6.2 and 6.3 of the Code. They would not be seen as disputing ownership of the artefacts and definitely would not be denying, contrary to all evidence that they ever heard of a desire by the people of Benin to have their artefacts back. This is clearly unworthy of Germany.

Benin9Most young Germans are surprised to hear that their government is in dispute with Nigerians over the ownership of the Benin Bronzes. They are revolted to learn that some 507 or more pieces are in Berlin alone and that the German authorities are not willing to return even a single object. Somebody will have to explain the discrepancy in the number of Benin artefacts in the Ethnologisches Museum, Berlin. (37) The youth wonder what those African pieces have to do with German culture. They cannot understand how their government can boast with African artefacts and wonder whether German culture does not have enough to show. Decorating yourself with the feathers of others seems very objectionable, especially when those feathers have been stolen.

The youth realize in this matter that the commandment “Thou shall not steal” does not seem to be applied by their own authorities as far as cultural artefacts are concerned.

What will Nigerian authorities and the public make out of the statement from Berlin that Nigerian representatives have not brought to the attention of the Germans the demand for the restitution of the Benin bronzes looted in 1897?

What is sure is that the people of Benin and Nigeria cannot accept that by putting information about the looted artefacts on internet or cataloguing them, they lose their right to recover the precious artefacts that are now decorating Western museums which are supposedly cooperating with Nigeria. Records and symbols of Benin civilization belong to Benin and should be returned without any further excuses.

Kwame Opoku, 6 September, 2013.


1. “Die Rückgabe jener Kulturschätze, die unsere Museen und Sammlungen direkt oder indirekt dem Kolonialsystem verdanken und die jetzt zurückverlangt werden, sollte ebenfalls nicht mit billigen Argumenten und Tricks hinausgezögert werden“. Gert v. Paczensky and Herbert Ganslmayr, Nofretete will nach Hause, p.185, C. Bertelsmann, München, 1984.

2. The Humboldt-Forum-Planning-Process-Perspectives in the Berliner Schloss Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz, 2013

Humboldt Forum, Baessler Archiv, Beiträge zur Völkerkunde, Band 59. (Eds)

Viola König and Andrea Scholz, 2011.

The opponents of this project that would involve transferring artefacts from the Ethnologisches Museum from its present location in the suburb, Dahlem, to the centre of Berlin have issued protest documents in which they state their objections. Resolution; Stop the planned construction of the Humboldt Forum in Berlin Palace

NO HUMBOLDT 21 http///

Der Anti Humboldt

„Colonialism on display“

Nadia Vancauwenberghe…colonialism-on-disp

3. Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin Drucksache 17 / 12 360 Kleine Anfrage 17. Wahlperiode Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Clara Herrmann (GRÜNE) vom 28. Juni 2013 (Eingang beim Abgeordnetenhaus am 01. Juli 2013) und Antwort (Postkoloniale) Auseinandersetzung mit dem Humboldt Forum.

The Federal Minister for Culture has also given answers to similar questions from the Green Party, confirming the views from the Berlin Government-Annex II

4. K. Opoku, “Benin Plan of Action for Restitution; Will this Ensure the Return of the Looted Benin Artefacts?

5. K, Opoku,”Berlin Plea for the Return of Nigeria’s Cultural Objects: How often must Nigeria ask for the Return of its Stolen Cultural Objects?

6. K. Opoku, ibid

7. Ekpo Eyo, Museum, Vol. XXL, no 1, 1979, “Return and Restitution of cultural property”, pp. 18-21, at p.21, Nigeria.

8. BBC NEWS, “Nigeria demands treasures back”, http;//

9. Appendix 21. The Case of BeninMemorandum submitted by Prince Edun Akenzua …/371ap27.htm‎.March 2000

10. K. Opoku, Opening of the exhibition “Benin-Kings and Rituals

K. Opoku, “Director of Museum für Völkerkunde Wien rejects again all claims for return of stolen artworks actually exhibited in his museum”

11. OmoN’Oba Erediauwa CFR, Oba of Benin, in his Introductory Note to the catalogue of the exhibition’ Barbara Plankensteiner (ed) Benin Kings and Rituals, Court Arts from Nigeria, Snoeck Publishers, 2007, p. 13.

12. See Yusuf Abdallah Usman, “Controversial Donation of Looted Benin Art” in K. Opoku, “Nigeria Reacts to Donation of Looted Benin Artefacts to Museum of Fine Arts, Boston”, http://www.modernghana.comYusuf Abdallah Usman,“Nigeria’s antiquities abroad must return -DG”
“Efforts at dialoguing have brought about recent interface with most of the major museums in Europe. The Commission instigated discussions on modalities of returning Benin objects to Nigeria. This has resulted in the meeting of the major museums in Europe and the Commission in Vienna, Austria and Berlin, Germany in 2010 and 2011 respectively. A third meeting is scheduled for Benin City before the end of this year. The heads of these European museums have signified their intention to attend this meeting. It will be recalled that Nigeria was one of the strong voices in the Egyptian Conference of 2010 where return of the pieces of each countries priceless antiquities were demanded to be returned to their countries of origin.”

“Nigeria’s antiquities abroad must return“

The Nation, “Mission to repatriate stolen Benin artefacts”
“They were stolen over 116 years ago and taken to Europe. These over 3,000 pieces of bronze were looted from the old Benin Empire during the 1897 British Punitive Expedition. Today, these priceless bronze works are trapped behind glass walls in European galleries and museums. Hope for their return rose last week as some representatives of European museums met with their Nigerian counterparts and officials of the Benin Royal palace on the issue. Assistant Editor (Arts) OZOLUA UHAKHEME reports.” /…/mission-to-repatriate-stolen.

Nigeria Demands Return of Stolen Benin Artefacts from U.S.” /stories/ 201207190121.html

Daily Times, “NCMM demands return of artifacts from US museum” /…

13. nefertiti in absurdity: how often must egyptians ask germans for the …

14. K. Opoku, “Is the Absence of a Formal Demand for Restitution a Ground for Non-Restitution?

15. The United Nations General Assembly has since 1972, passed almost every year a resolution the return of cultural property;

  • Resolution 3026 A (XXVII) of 18 December 1972
  • Resolution 3148 (XXVIII) of 14 December 1973
  • Resolution 3187 (XXVIII) of 18 December 1973
  • Resolution 3391 (XXX) of 19 November 1975
  • Resolution 31/40 of 30 November 1976
  • Resolution 32/18 of 11 Novembrer 1977
  • Resolution 33/50 of 14 December 1978
  • Resolution 34/64 of 29 November 1979
  • Resolutions 35/127 and 35/128 of 11 December 1980
  • Resolution 36/64 of 27 November 1981
  • Resolution 38/34 of 25 November 1983
  • Resolution 40/19 of 21 November 1985
  • Resolution 42/7 of 22 October 1987
  • Resolution 44/18 of 6 November 1989
  • Resolution 46/10 of 22 October 1991
  • Resolution 48/15 of 2 November 1993
  • Resolution 50/56 of 11 December 1995
  • Resolution 52/24 of 25 November 1997
  • Resolution 54/190 of 17 December 1999
  • Resolution 56/97 of 14 December 2001
  • Resolution 1483 of 22 May 2003 by the Security Council of the UN concerning Iraq
  • Resolution 58/17 of 3 December 2003
  • Resolution 61/52 of 4 December 2006
  • Resolution 64/78 of 7 December 2009
  • Resolution A.67/L.34 of 5 December 2012

From UNESCO website,


17.  Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, p.302

18. The Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970)


20. There is a vast amount of literature on the notorious British invasion of Benin in 1097. I mention here just a few.

Ekpo Eyo, “Benin: The sack that was”. ,”The

Dialectics of Definitions: “Massacre” and “Sack” in the History of the Punitive

Expedition”, African Arts, 1997, Vol. XXX, No.3, pp. 34-35.

Wikipedia, “Benin Expedition of 1897”

K. Opoku, “Benin to Berlin Ethnologisches Museum: Are Benin Bronzes Made in Berlin?”

Frank Willet, “Benin” in Afrika: Kunst und Kultur (ed.) Hans-Joachim Koloss, Prestel Verlag, Munich, 1999 p. 43 states that Phillips and his troops had peaceful intentions, and that the guns they had with them had been packed away and not ready for usage.

The story of Benin has been told several times but I have always found the short account by Sylvester Okwunodu Ogbechie very useful:

“In February 1897, an elite British force of about 1200 men (supported by several hundred African auxiliary troops and thousands of African porters) besieged Benin City, capital of the Edo Kingdom of Benin, whose ruler, the Oba Ovonramwen sat on a throne that was a thousand years old. The British Punitive Expedition used Maxim machine guns to mow down most of the Oba’s 130,000 soldiers and secure control of the capital city. They set fire to the city and looted the palace of 500 years worth of bronze objects that constituted the royal archive of Benin’s history, an irreplaceable national treasure. The king and his principal chiefs fled into the countryside, pursued by British forces who lay waste to the countryside as a strategy to force the people of Benin to give up their fugitive king. According to Richard Gott, for a further six months, a small British force harried the countryside in search of the Oba and his chiefs who had fled. Cattle was seized and villages destroyed. Not until August was the Oba cornered and brought back to his ruined city. An immense throng was assembled to witness the ritual humiliation that the British imposed on their subject peoples. The Oba was required to kneel down in front of the British military “resident” the town and to literally bite the dust. Supported by two chiefs, the king made obeisance three times, rubbing his forehead on the ground three times. He was told that he had been deposedOba Ovonramwen finally surrendered to stem the slaughter of his people. Many of his soldiers considered his surrender an unbearable catastrophe and committed suicide rather than see the king humiliated. A significant number, led by some chiefs, maintained guerrilla warfare against the British for almost two years until their leaders were captured and executed. The remaining arms of the resistance thereafter gave up their arms and merged back into the general population.”

21. Der überwiegende Teil der heute 507 Objekte umfassenden Benin-Sammlung des Ethnologischen Museums wurde zwischen 1897 und 1925 auf dem Kunst-markt in London, teilweise auch in Lagos erworben. Der Senat und die Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz sind der Auffassung, dass die Objekte rechtmäßig erworben wurden und es für eine Restitution dieser Sammlung keine völkerrechtliche Grundlage gibt.“ Drucksache 17 / 12 360 Kleine Anfrage 17

See note 2 above.

22. Elizabeth Coombes, Reinventing Africa, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1994,

pp. 59-60; se also, John Mack, L’ethnographie: un catalysateur, p.227 in: Du Musée colonial au musée des cultures du monde, P Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris, 2000

23. See a portrait of von Luschan in K, Opoku, “Benin to Berlin Ethnologisches Museum” Are Benin Bronzes Made in Berlin?” Annex

24. Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects,  Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 2006, p.26.

25. Andy Ho, “Case for returning pillaged antiquities”The Straits Times 12-03-2009.

26. Neil Brodle -“Compromise and restorative justice: More about Benin” benin_ 2011. pdf

27. Seit 2010 gibt es regelmäßige Treffen zwischen Vertreterinnen und Vertretern des Königs von Benin, der National Commission of Museums and Monuments in Nigeria und verschiedenen europäischen Museen mit großen Benin-Sammlungen (London, Wien, Leiden, Stockholm, Dresden) zur Frage des Umgangs mit Objekten aus dem Königreich Benin. Gemeinsam vereinbartes Ziel aller Beteiligten ist es, langfristig eine Möglichkeit zu finden, Objekte aus europäischen Benin-Sammlungen in Nigeria zu präsentieren. Zurzeit liegt der Schwerpunkt der Arbeit auf der Dokumentation von Benin-Sammlungen in Europa, der Bereitstellung dieser Dokumentation im Internet sowie der Intensivierung der Zusammenarbeit aller beteiligten Museen und Institutionen.“

See note 3 above.
28.  The Guardian, “Amid hope of restitution, Nigeria hosts foreign museums
As Nigeria hosts some representatives of holders of the country’s looted cultural objects as part of efforts towards the return of the controversial artefatcs, the country’s dialogue or diplomatic approach is once again on the spot.” Tajudeen,15 February 2013,  ”Amid hope of restitution, Nigeria hosts foreign museums”

The Guardian Nigeria, 15.2.2013
Nigerian Tribune, Stolen Benin artefactsHope of retrieval beckons – Nigerian Tribune
“The Benin National Congress recently picked up the struggle from where previous groups had stopped. BNC argued that the Federal Government was not doing enough, saying that a proactive government would strive to use every diplomatic and international legal means to redress the injustices done to its federating units. The group called on President Goodluck Jonathan to constitute a high-powered committee to prosecute the task of repatriating all looted Benin artefacts. So, when the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM), led by its Director General, Mr Yusuf Abdallah Usman, last month visited Benin on the same mission, there was indeed hope that perhaps the long lost treasures would return home one day.” /… /6655-stolen-benin-artefacts-hope…

29. K. Opoku,“Benin Plan of Action(2): Will this Miserable Project Be the Last Word on the Looted Benin Artefacts?”

30 „Der Senat ist überzeugt davon, dass die „Ethischen Richtlinien für Museen von ICOM“ die Grundlage für die Arbeit der Museen in Berlin bilden und sie sich ihrer historischen und politischen Verantwortung beim Umgang mit Erwerbungen aus der Kolonialzeit bewusst sind.“.

 Drucksache 17 / 12 360 Kleine Anfrage 17. See note 2 above.

31. The literature on German colonies is vast. We mention below a few that may interest readers:

Ames, Eric, Marcia Klotz, and Lora Wildenthal, eds.Germany’s Colonial Pasts. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2005

Helmut Bley, Kolonialherrschaft und Sozialstruktur in Deutsch-Sűdwestafrika (1894-1914) Hamburg, Leibniz Verlag, 1968

Horst Drechsler, Südwestafrika unter deutscher Kolonialherrschaft.

Der Kampf der Herero und Nama gegen den deutschen Imperialismus (1884-

1915) Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1985;

Horst Gründer, Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien, Paderborn: Schöningh, 2000.

W. O .Henderson, Studies in German Colonial History, Frank Cass, 1962, London.

Forster, Stig, Wolfgang Mommsen, and Ronald Robinson, eds. Bismarck, Europe and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988

Stoecker, Helmut, ed. German Imperialism in Africa: From the Beginnings Until the Second World War. London: Hurst, 1987

Speitkamp, Winifred, Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte, Stuttgart, Reclam, 2005.

Helmut Strizek, Kolonien Geschenkte:Ruanda und Burundi unter deutscher Herrschaft, Berlin, Ch. Links Verlag, 2006

Ulrich van der Heyden and Joachim Zeller (Eds.), Macht und Anteil an der Weltherrschaft, Unrast Verlag, Münster, 2005.

Regarding the Ethnology museum and the acquisition of artefacts from the colonies, one could read the following with great benefit:

Manfred Gothsch, Die deutsche Völkerkunde und ihr Verhältnis zum Kolonialismus, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 1983.

H.Glenn Penny, Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany; Objects of Culture, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London, 2002.

Christine Stelzig, Afrika am Museum für Völkerkunde zu Berlin 1873-1919, Centaurus Verlag, Herbolzheim 2004.

Andrew Zimmerman, Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany, University of Chicago Press, 2001.

On the continuity and discontinuity between German colonialism and Nazi ideology and practice, see inter alia, Volker Langbein and Mohammad Salama (eds) German ColonialismRace,the Holocaust,and Postwar Germany, Columbia University Press,New York, 2011.

Sara Friedrichsmeyer, Sara Lennox and Susanne Zantop (eds) The Imperialist Imagination-German Colonialism and Its Legacy provide interesting perspectives on the reluctance to examine the German colonial past.

A detailed overview of the available literature can be found at the end of the excellent book, Conrad, Sebastian. German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012 This is an English translation of the German original Deutsche Kolonialgeschichte,Verlag C. H. Beck, Munich, 2008.

32. Helmut Stoecker,” Germans in the Tropics”: Essays in German Colonial History, (Eds.), Arthur J. Knoll and Lewis H. Gann, Greenwood Press, New York, 1987, p.125.

33. „Dass der Erwerb von Ethnographica in der Kolonialzeit auf der Grundlage mehr oder minder ‘struktureller Gewalt’ erfolgte, soll hier in diesem Rahmen nicht näher verfolgt werden. Einzelnen Zeitgenossen war diese Tatsache im Übrigen durchaus bewußt. So schrieb der Afrikareisende und Resident des Deutschen Reiches in Ruanda, Richard Kandt, 1897 an Felix von Luschan, den stellvertretenden Direktor des Berliner Völkerkunde-Museums: Überhaupt ist es schwer, einen Gegenstand zu erhalten, ohne zum mindesten etwas Gewalt anzuwenden. Ich glaube, daß die Hälfte Ihres Museums gestohlen ist’. p77

Cornelia Essner, “Berlins Völkerkunde-Museum in der Kolonialära: Anmerkungen zum Verhältnis von Ethnologie und Kolonialismus in Deutschland“, in: Berlin in Geschichte und Gegenwart – Jahrbuch des Landesarchivs Berlin, (Ed.) Hans J. Reichardt, Siedler Verlag, 1986

34. K. Opoku, “Return of Stolen Skulls by Germany to Namibia; Closure of a Horrible Chapter?”

35. Magnus Magnusson, in Jeanette Greenfield, The Return of Cultural Treasures, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p.12.

36. K. Opoku, “Declaration on the Importance and Value of Universal Museums; Singular Failure of an Arrogant Imperialist Project”

37. I reproduce below, a note I made on the issue of how many Benin artefacts the Ethnologisches Museum, Berlin has from my article, “Benin to Berlin Ethnologisches Museum: Are Benin Bronzes Made in Berlin?”,

The discrepancies in numbers, between 507 the Berlin government states and the 580 which Luschan and others give, require explanation from the Museum. We know of course that the British sold some of the looted Bronzes not only in 1897 but in fairly recent times. See Martin Bailey, “BBC Sold Benin Bronzes” Did the Germans also sell some Benin Bronzes? What happened to the Benin artefacts in the museums of the former DD (German Democratic Republic)?

Barbara Plankensteiner states in her latest book Benin, 5 Continents Editions, 2010, p48, “ Felix von Luschan, the curator at Berlin’s Museum für Völkerkunde, played a major role, encouraging his colleagues to collect, and he himself amassing the largest collection in the world, consisting of some more than 550 pieces.”

“Paula Ivanov, ‘African Art in the Ethnologisches Museum in Berlin’, African Arts, Vol.33, No.3, p.21. Ivanov mentions in this article, that the Ethnologisches Museum, Berlin has 482 Benin objects (p21) but P.Roese in his article, ‘Felix von Luschan (1854-1924) und Benin – Hans Grimm gewidmet’, (Tribus, Vol.48, 1999, pp.173-182) states that Felix von Luschan secured for the Museum 580 pieces. Anja Laukötter, in herexcellent book, Von der ‘Kultur’ zur ‘Rasse’ – vom Objekt zum Körper : Völkerkundemuseen und ihre Wissenschaft zu Beginn des 20.Jahhunderts (Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, 2007,P160), cites Luschan as follows:

‘Im ganzen sind rund 2400 Benin Stűcke zu meiner Kenntnis gelangt: davon sind 580 in Berlin, 280 im Brit.Museum, 227 in Rushmore (die von Pitt Rivers hinterlassene Sammlung), 196 in Hamburg,182 in Dresden, 167 in Wien, 98 in Leiden, 87 in Leipzig, 80 in Stuttgart, 76 in Cőln und 51 in Franfurt a .M.’

What explains this difference of some 73 pieces? Perhaps the Ethnologisches Museum kept the best 503 and distributed the remaining 73 to the other German museums?

In this connection, it may be useful to look at the very interesting study by Charlotta Dohlvik, Museums and their Voices: a Contemporary Study of the Benin Bronzes, Master’s Dissertation, May 2006, Göteborg University. Dohlvik states that ‘the largest collection of Benin items are found at the Ethnological Museum in Berlin’. The author also found out that the ‘collections of Benin heads are strongly concentrated in museums of Western Europe and the United States’ and that ‘The often-heard statement about the collection of Benin material being dispersed all over the world is thus a point of description that should be expressed with some moderation. p.29”

See also Gisela Völger, Curator, Trader, Benin Scholar – Felix von Luschan -An Austrian in Royal-Prussian Museum Service, in Benin Kings and Rituals (Ed.) Plankensteiner ,pp. 213-225. Völger gives the following distribution figures for the 2400 objects said to have reached Europe:
In Germany: Berlin 580, Hamburg 196, Dresden 182, Leipzig 87, Stuttgart 80, Cologne 73, Munich, Braunschweig, Mannheim, Freiburg and others in Germany not more than 95 items.
Outside Germany: British Museum 280, Pitt Rivers Museum (Oxford) and Pitt Rivers country residence, Rushmore in Farnham/Dorset 327, Various members of the Punitive Expedition of 1897 300, Leiden 98, Chicago 33, St. Petersburg 40, Vienna 167.
Laukötter, gives the following distribution, following Luschan: of the 2400 objects that left Benin: 580 in Berlin, 280 in British Museum, 227 in Rushmore, the Pitt Rivers Collection, 196 in Hamburg, 182 in Dresden,167 in Vienna, 98 in Leiden, 87 in Leipzig, 80 in Stuttgart, 76 in Cologne, and 51 in Frankfurt am Main. Laukötter, op. cit. p.160.“


Felix von Luschan, Die Altertümer von Benin, hrsg. mit Untertstützung des Reichs-Kolonialministeriums, der Rudolf Virchow- und der Arthur Baesssler-Stiftung, 1919

Band 1

Band 2

Band 3




704 Gedanken zu „Nigeria

  1. Pingback: Alcohol Rehab Near Me

  2. Pingback: service learning reflection essay

  3. Pingback: cialis online

  4. Pingback: custom essays writing

  5. Pingback: phd no dissertation

  6. Pingback: college essay help nyc

  7. Pingback: cheap essay writing services

  8. Pingback: research papers writing service

  9. Pingback: thesis topics in education

  10. Pingback: thesis editing services

  11. Pingback: find someone to write my paper

  12. Pingback: augmentin potassium clavulanate

  13. Pingback: sophia viagra hot

  14. Pingback: cialis or viagra

  15. Pingback: viagra cost

  16. Pingback: pictures of cephalexin 500mg

  17. Pingback: cialis buy online

  18. Pingback: online cialis

  19. Pingback: how does cialis work

  20. Pingback: cost of ciprofloxacin at walmart

  21. Pingback: tadalafil online

  22. Pingback: ditropan contraindicated in glaucoma

  23. Pingback: viagra prank

  24. Pingback: viagra coupon

  25. Pingback: viagra doses

  26. Pingback: ingredients of tizanidine

  27. Pingback: viagra and alcohol

  28. Pingback: side affects of aripiprazole

  29. Pingback: allopurinol for heart conditions in dogs

  30. Pingback: amiodarone davis pdf

  31. Pingback: amitriptyline recreational use

  32. Pingback: amlodipine side affects

  33. Pingback: amoxicillin 875 mg for sinus infection

  34. Pingback: aripiprazole tablets

  35. Pingback: cheap prescription drugs online

  36. Pingback: cvs atorvastatin

  37. Pingback: can i take tylenol with azithromycin

  38. Pingback: texas state board of pharmacy

  39. Pingback: best online pharmacies canada

  40. Pingback: In Germany, the Humboldt Forum stirs up a colonial controversy - Go Shops2U

  41. Pingback: In Germany, a new museum stirs up a colonial controversy – Totally news

  42. Pingback: Flomax

  43. Pingback: trusted online pharmacy reviews

  44. Pingback: what is baclofen 10mg used for

  45. Pingback: side effects of baclofen 10 mg

  46. Pingback: alcohol and bupropion

  47. Pingback: viagra

  48. Pingback: buspirone diarrhea

  49. Pingback: buspar doseage

  50. Pingback: carvedilol and a

  51. Pingback: En Allemagne, l’exposition de centaines d’œuvres africaines relance la controverse coloniale – Louvre.Online

  52. Pingback: does celebrex thin the blood

  53. Pingback: cocaine and celexa

  54. Pingback: viagra 100mg

  55. Pingback: viagra natural

  56. Pingback: viagra

  57. Pingback: 100mg viagra

  58. Pingback: cheap levitra

  59. Pingback: homemade sex on viagra

  60. Pingback: what is the meaning of the two bathtubs in the cialis commercials

  61. Pingback: viagra help women

  62. Pingback: Koloniale Verstrickungen – Das Humboldt-Forum – Theater dekolonisieren?!

  63. Pingback: can i take cialis with plavix

  64. Pingback: neurotransmitter than viagra effects

  65. Pingback: cialis professional india

  66. Pingback: cialis purchase canada

  67. Pingback: cost of tadalafil without insurance

  68. Pingback: cialis tadalafil paypal

  69. Pingback: cialis without presciption in usa

  70. Pingback: cialis softtabs online

  71. Pingback: buy viagra online australia no prescription

  72. Pingback: cialis free 30 day supply

  73. Pingback: is amoxicillin safe

  74. Pingback: azithromycin 500 mg

  75. Pingback: etoricoxib vs celecoxib

  76. Pingback: cephalexin dosage pneumonia

  77. Pingback: how to taper off cymbalta

  78. Pingback: amoxicillin ear infection

  79. Pingback: ordering cialis online australia

  80. Pingback: azithromycin for strep throat

  81. Pingback: pvrcnngx

  82. Pingback: cialis sale 20mg

  83. Pingback: celebrex with ibuprofen

  84. Pingback: keflex versus cipro

  85. Pingback: where can i buy kamagra

  86. Pingback: viagra wat doet het met je

  87. Pingback: duloxetine is what

  88. Pingback: how much azithromycin 250 mg for respiratory infection

  89. Pingback: buy cialis online best price

  90. Pingback: sildenafil in pa

  91. Pingback: diferença entre viagra e cialis

  92. Pingback: cost of tadalafil without insurance

  93. Pingback: viagra 100 mg

  94. Pingback: viagra

  95. Pingback: uk essay writing services

  96. Pingback: cialis in europe

  97. Pingback: how to write an abstract for research paper

  98. Pingback: cheap write my essay

  99. Pingback: essay help uk

  100. Pingback: business ethics essay question

  101. Pingback: cost of tadalafil without insurance

  102. Pingback: why choose levitra over viagra

  103. Pingback: cost of tadalafil without insurance

  104. Pingback: cost of tadalafil without insurance

  105. Pingback: can you purchase amoxicillin online

  106. Pingback: furosemide australia

  107. Pingback: can you buy azithromycin

  108. Pingback: ivermectin 250ml

  109. Pingback: combivent 100 mcg 20 mcg

  110. Pingback: viagra on line

  111. Pingback: avanafil vs viagra

  112. Pingback: homemade viagra

  113. Pingback: female viagra prank

  114. Pingback: warnings for viagra

  115. Pingback: viagra sin receta

  116. Pingback: vardenafil generic

  117. Pingback: warnings for cialis

  118. Pingback: sildenafil citrate

  119. Pingback: cialis soft

  120. Pingback: doxycycline and coronavirus

  121. Pingback: prednisolone dosage

  122. Pingback: viagra in action

  123. Pingback: liquid clomid

  124. Pingback: female viagra sex

  125. Pingback: levitra side effects

  126. Pingback: priligy dapoxetin kaufen

  127. Pingback: viagra boner mom

  128. Pingback: viagra boots

  129. Pingback: obat diflucan fluconazole

  130. Pingback: order cialis online

  131. Pingback: cialis free trial

  132. Pingback: synthroid sun sensitivity

  133. Pingback: common app essay help

  134. Pingback: help me write a thesis statement

  135. Pingback: best rated essay writing service

  136. Pingback: dissertation editing services

  137. Pingback: phd thesis search

  138. Pingback: vidalista 20 mg price costco

  139. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine price comparison

  140. Pingback: custom essay writing canada

  141. Pingback: tadalafil 100mg india

  142. Pingback: essay writing service scam

  143. Pingback: trump's ties to hydroxychloroquine

  144. Pingback: buy generic cialis fast shipping

  145. Pingback: medicamentos propecia

  146. Pingback: dissertation structure

  147. Pingback: vidalista vs viagra vs levitra which is better

  148. Pingback: recent hydroxychloroquine study results

  149. Pingback: discount generic tadalafil

  150. Pingback: custom papers for college

  151. Pingback: best viagra tablet price in india

  152. Pingback: generic viagra cialis paypal

  153. Pingback: liquid cialis blue bottle

  154. Pingback: generic cialis soft tabs tadalafil 20mg

  155. Pingback: cialis now generic

  156. Pingback: generic cialis tadalafil india

  157. Pingback: viagra alternative

  158. Pingback: cialis soft tabs overnight

  159. Pingback: viagra before dental work

  160. Pingback: the facts about generic viagra

  161. Pingback: sildenafil for you

  162. Pingback: viagra penis growth

  163. Pingback: do have to have a prescription for cialis?

  164. Pingback: 30 day free cialis trial

  165. Pingback: pornhub step viagra

  166. Pingback: neurontin headache

  167. Pingback: what does keflex look like

  168. Pingback: metformin and fasting

  169. Pingback: paxil weight

  170. Pingback: plaquenil cost

  171. Pingback: vidalista discount card

  172. Pingback: canadian online pharmacies prescription drugs

  173. Pingback: canadian pharmacies online prescriptions

  174. Pingback: azithromycin 500 mg uses

  175. Pingback: cialis with dapoxetine mastercard

  176. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine for sale india

  177. Pingback: cipro and covid

  178. Pingback: cialis for daily use online

  179. Pingback: price comparison tadalafil

  180. Pingback: dapoxetine dapoxetine levitra comparison

  181. Pingback: cheap sildenafil 20 mg

  182. Pingback: nizagara vs viagra australia

  183. Pingback: alternatives to levitra

  184. Pingback: cialis vs viagra steroids

  185. Pingback: viagra gel price

  186. Pingback: cialis logo australia

  187. Pingback: sildenafil 50 mg price in india

  188. Pingback: can i order cialis online in canada

  189. Pingback: will cialis be available otc

  190. Pingback: prescription cialis en france

  191. Pingback: mature wifes viagra boner

  192. Pingback: sildenafil 25 mg coupon

  193. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine mexico online

  194. Pingback: sildenafil buy online india

  195. Pingback: cheapest price for viagra 100mg

  196. Pingback: canada drugs online pharmacy

  197. Pingback: online viagra seller kansas

  198. Pingback: acheter levitra canada

  199. Pingback: sildenafil online canada

  200. Pingback: buy cialis philippines

  201. Pingback: generic cialis 60 mg

  202. Pingback: amoxil otchs

  203. Pingback: cialis for sale mexico

  204. Pingback: prednisone 20 mg dosage instructions

  205. Pingback: prednisone 5mg tab side effects

  206. Pingback: comparaison viagra cialis et levitra

  207. Pingback: erectile dysfunction pills

  208. Pingback: walgreens antibiotics cost

  209. Pingback: find cheap cialis online

  210. Pingback: ed meds online

  211. Pingback: buy hydroxychloroquine plaquenil

  212. Pingback: where can i buy cialis in the uk

  213. Pingback: cialis pills canada

  214. Pingback: buy cialis online generic

  215. Pingback: generic cialis 7days

  216. Pingback: 20mg low price

  217. Pingback: most popular sildenafil citrate 20 mg

  218. Pingback: canadian cialis cheap

  219. Pingback: payday loan dallas

  220. Pingback: instant payday loans green bay

  221. Pingback: viagra central serous retinopathy

  222. Pingback: retin a canada prescription

  223. Pingback: magnum cash advance scam

  224. Pingback: viagra and psychogenic ed

  225. Pingback: quick cash advance santa barbara

  226. Pingback: Flint And Steel Tinder

  227. Pingback: 20 mg cost

  228. Pingback: how long viagra last

  229. Pingback: cheapest price for generic cialis

  230. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine drug interaction

  231. Pingback: can i buy in uk

  232. Pingback: 20 mg cost

  233. Pingback: can i buy in uk

  234. Pingback: lovoo vip kostenlos apk

  235. Pingback: free dating sites for sex nebraska

  236. Pingback: best place to buy ativan online

  237. Pingback: generic cialis september 2018

  238. Pingback: what's the difference between viagra and cialis

  239. Pingback: careprost india

  240. Pingback: free online dating community sites

  241. Pingback: free dating in florida

  242. Pingback: dating site for free

  243. Pingback: Adult dating site

  244. Pingback: cialis dosage frequency

  245. Pingback: christian dating for free review

  246. Pingback: erythromycin ophthalmic ointment usp dosage

  247. Pingback: which of the following statements about prescription drugs is false?

  248. Pingback: tadalafil chewable tablets 20 mg

  249. Pingback: dilaudid online pharmacy

  250. Pingback: cialis 2.5 mg daily

  251. Pingback: online cialis pharmacy

  252. Pingback: liquid tadalafil peptides

  253. Pingback: over the counter cialis cvs

  254. Pingback: new age dating sites free

  255. Pingback: cialis 5 mg canada

  256. Pingback: buy hydroxychloroquine from india

  257. Pingback: free sex dating chat

  258. Pingback: dating sim games for free

  259. Pingback: david deangelo double your dating free download

  260. Pingback: 100 free no charge dating sites

  261. Pingback: 5mg vidalista daily effects

  262. Pingback: cialis 40mg

  263. Pingback: cialis soft gel

  264. Pingback: viagra connect cvs

  265. Pingback: cvs prescription cost estimator

  266. Pingback: does alcohol affect azithromycin

  267. Pingback: proventil albuterol

  268. Pingback: tadalafil citrate 20mg

  269. Pingback: viagra rx

  270. Pingback: cialis shelf life

  271. Pingback: viagra erection

  272. Pingback: buy cialis canada

  273. Pingback: viagra without prescription uk

  274. Pingback: chloroquine for covid 19 prevention

  275. Pingback: viagra dose

  276. Pingback: cialis forms

  277. Pingback: what is sildenafil

  278. Pingback: gabapentin medication

  279. Pingback:

  280. Pingback: cialis prices walmart

  281. Pingback: vardenafil sublingual generic

  282. Pingback: ivermectin dosing

  283. Pingback: acheter viagra

  284. Pingback: norvasc 5mg

  285. Pingback: atorvastatin 20mg

  286. Pingback: meloxicam 10

  287. Pingback: metoprolol tart

  288. Pingback: losartan recall

  289. Pingback: order viagra

  290. Pingback: cialis 20mg usa

  291. Pingback: levitra tablets uk

  292. Pingback: 100 free dating sites for singles in usa

  293. Pingback: duloxetine dosing

  294. Pingback: free 100 dating site in europe

  295. Pingback: new free dating site without any payment

  296. Pingback: prednisone and alcohol

  297. Pingback: amitriptyline overdose

  298. Pingback: french free dating site

  299. Pingback: duloxetine 20 mg

  300. Pingback: hydrochlorothiazide 25

  301. Pingback: metformin recalled 2020

  302. Pingback: mirtazapine side effects

  303. Pingback: all free sex dating

  304. Pingback: wellbutrin and methamphetamine

  305. Pingback: buspar generic

  306. Pingback: generic for citalopram

  307. Pingback: zanaflex 4mg tablets

  308. Pingback: wellbutrin withdrawal symptoms

  309. Pingback: acyclovir dose for suppressive therapy

  310. Pingback: diclofenac patch

  311. Pingback: clonidine dosing for anxiety

  312. Pingback: warnings for finasteride

  313. Pingback: tadalafil precautions

  314. Pingback: carvedilol uses

  315. Pingback: metronidazole dosage for dogs

  316. Pingback: cialis price list

  317. Pingback: sildenafil canada

  318. Pingback: cialis vs viagra

  319. Pingback: viagra 100mg tablets

  320. Pingback: vardenafil tablets 20 mg

  321. Pingback: buy hydroxychloroquine from india online

  322. Pingback: priligy price per pill

  323. Pingback: acyclovir cost uk

  324. Pingback: amoxicillin trihydrate

  325. Pingback: aricept other names

  326. Pingback: amoxicillin mechanism of action

  327. Pingback: azithromycin 500mg tablets

  328. Pingback: omnicef

  329. Pingback: generic keflex

  330. Pingback: clindamycin hcl

  331. Pingback: erythromycin gel brand name

  332. Pingback: zithromax

  333. Pingback: buy cialis with paypal

  334. Pingback: tadalafil dosage bodybuilding

  335. Pingback: 100mg viagra cost

  336. Pingback: cialis price mexico

  337. Pingback: ivermectin for lice treatment

  338. Pingback: viagra uses

  339. Pingback: keto bakery near me

  340. Pingback: keto popsicles

  341. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine in canada for humans

  342. Pingback: ketoacidosis keto diet

  343. Pingback: cialis 200mg pills generic

  344. Pingback: how to use levitra

  345. Pingback: generic sildenafil citrate 100mg

  346. Pingback: tadalafil capsules for sale

  347. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine 300 mg

  348. Pingback: canadian tadalafil online

  349. Pingback: sildenafil coupon 100 mg

  350. Pingback: viagra goes generic

  351. Pingback: sildenafil us pharmacy

  352. Pingback: generic viagra cost

  353. Pingback: viagra cvs

  354. Pingback: viagra for females

  355. Pingback: amlodipine olmesartan

  356. Pingback: cialis substitute

  357. Pingback: levitra price australia

  358. Pingback: metformin er

  359. Pingback: cialis 20mg europe

  360. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine supply chain

  361. Pingback: amoxicillin cost australia

  362. Pingback: doxycycline monohydrate vs hyclate

  363. Pingback: lasix for dogs

  364. Pingback: xenical pill

  365. Pingback: dapoxetine 10 mg

  366. Pingback: propecia cost india

  367. Pingback: careprost scam

  368. Pingback: clomid and twin rates

  369. Pingback: fluconazole dosing peds

  370. Pingback: motilone domperidone tablets 10mg

  371. Pingback: tamoxifen citrate mw

  372. Pingback: prednisolone liquid children

  373. Pingback: naltrexone medication contraindications

  374. Pingback: valtrex generic in mexico

  375. Pingback: tizanidine sar

  376. Pingback: cialis

  377. Pingback: cialis daily prescription

  378. Pingback: indications of ciprofloxacin

  379. Pingback: cialis paypal australia

  380. Pingback: liquid cialis

  381. Pingback: tadalafil india generic

  382. Pingback: viagra price

  383. Pingback: viagra alternative gnc

  384. Pingback: india pharmacy viagra

  385. Pingback:

  386. Pingback: online pharmacy technician jobs

  387. Pingback: how to enhance cialis effect

  388. Pingback: goodrx viagra

  389. Pingback: buy viagra on line

  390. Pingback: boston gay dating life

  391. Pingback: pricing of prescription drugs

  392. Pingback: lake county gay dating

  393. Pingback: chicago dating gay

  394. Pingback: gay free online dating

  395. Pingback: generic ivermectil sample

  396. Pingback: online pharmacy delivery delhi

  397. Pingback: viagra vitamins

  398. Pingback: sulfamethoxazole tmp ds tablet with food

  399. Pingback: In Germany, the Humboldt Forum stirs up a colonial controversy - National Geographic | Which Way Nigeria

  400. Pingback: stop taking tamoxifen

  401. Pingback: sandoz stromectol 6mg

  402. Pingback: priligy 1mg

  403. Pingback: clavivermecta 12

  404. Pingback: best time to take amlodipine

  405. Pingback: atorvastatin calcium 20 mg

  406. Pingback: prilosec otc and alcohol

  407. Pingback: fluoxetine half life

  408. Pingback: does prednisone cause stomach issues

  409. Pingback: how long does zoloft last

  410. Pingback: gay speed dating problem

  411. Pingback: gay mature men dating site

  412. Pingback: gay teenage dating website

  413. Pingback: pregabalin buy

  414. Pingback: escitalopram and uproprium medicine

  415. Pingback: reddit gay dating tips

  416. Pingback: cymbalta headache

  417. Pingback: best gay dating sites

  418. Pingback: sildenafil citrate

  419. Pingback: dating service for gay free

  420. Pingback: hydrochlorothiazide triamterene side effects

  421. Pingback: generic viagra

  422. Pingback: atorvastatin dry mouth

  423. Pingback: does medicaid cover tadalafil

  424. Pingback: online generic viagra

  425. Pingback: viagra

  426. Pingback: purchase cialis online

  427. Pingback: escitalopram 40mg

  428. Pingback: buy cialis cheap

  429. Pingback: stromectol 6mg treat parasite infestations 125mg

  430. Pingback: cialis 2.5 mg

  431. Pingback: cialis without prescription

  432. Pingback: cialis 5

  433. Pingback: cialis alternative

  434. Pingback: order viagra united states

  435. Pingback: natural viagra

  436. Pingback: 1

  437. Pingback: viagra buy online

  438. Pingback: duloxetine hcl dr 30 mg increase blood flow to penis

  439. Pingback: sildenafil 20 mg

  440. Pingback: ivermectin 12 mg

  441. Pingback: para que sirve el ivermectin

  442. Pingback: viagra buy toronto

  443. Pingback: generic cialis no prescription

  444. Pingback: sildenafil 100mg

  445. Pingback: order viagra legally

  446. Pingback: viagra rx pharmacy

  447. Pingback: sildenafil 50mg tablets uk

  448. Pingback: amoxil 400mg

  449. Pingback: how long for cialis to peak

  450. Pingback: buy viagra online cheap

  451. Pingback: ivermectin pulled from shelves

  452. Pingback: propecia price

  453. Pingback: buying generic viagra online

  454. Pingback: cialis generic

  455. Pingback: prednisone 20mg tablets where to buy

  456. Pingback: cheapest tadalafil 20mg india

  457. Pingback: buy viagra online with paypal in canada

  458. Pingback: order stromectol

  459. Pingback: purchase cheap viagra

  460. Pingback: stromectol dose

  461. Pingback: cost of cialis per pill

  462. Pingback: sildenafil tablets 120mg

  463. Pingback: ivermectin paste for pigs

  464. Pingback: cialis online no prescription

  465. Pingback: zithramax used for

  466. Pingback: ivermectin discovery

  467. Pingback: topical ivermectin rosacea

  468. Pingback: how much 1.87 ivermectin for horses do i give 15 lb dog

  469. Pingback: buy sildenafil without prescription cheap

  470. Pingback: purchase ventolin evohaler

  471. Pingback: safe canadian pharmacies viagra cialis

  472. Pingback: ivermectin for humans for sale

  473. Pingback: costco pharmacy aurogra price

  474. Pingback: generic viagra super active reviews

  475. Pingback: how long does it take ivermectin to work

  476. Pingback: ivermectin injectable dosage for horses

  477. Pingback: viagra over the counter or herbs

  478. Pingback: cialis price

  479. Pingback: tadalafil biogaran

  480. Pingback: cialis online

  481. Pingback: z pack without insurance

  482. Pingback: is it legal to buy viagra online without a prescription

  483. Pingback: viagra pill for men

  484. Pingback: buy stromectol over the counter

  485. Pingback: generic sildenafil citrate

  486. Pingback: harris teeter pharmacy website

  487. Pingback: ivermectin on ebay 50ml

  488. Pingback: sildenafil 50 mg

  489. Pingback: lisinopril russian

  490. Pingback: personal loan forms

  491. Pingback: slotocash no deposit

  492. Pingback: max dose ivermectin oral

  493. Pingback: viagra online pharmacy

  494. Pingback: dapoxetine polska

  495. Pingback: buy viagra online new york

  496. Pingback: ivermectin dose calculator

  497. Pingback: how to get cheap cialis

  498. Pingback: generic z pack over the counter

  499. Pingback: cheap viagra

  500. Pingback: human ivermectin

  501. Pingback: dosing ivermectin 1.87% for humans

  502. Pingback: otc z pack

  503. Pingback: viagra buy china

  504. Pingback: doctor x viagra

  505. Pingback: viagra 25mg

  506. Pingback: viagra without doctor prescription usa

  507. Pingback: viagra pills price in india

  508. Pingback: genuine viagra without a doctor prescription

  509. Pingback: viagra dosage

  510. Pingback: viagra pills

  511. Pingback: viagra no prescription

  512. Pingback: medication refill online

  513. Pingback: generic amoxil

  514. Pingback: lasix medication

  515. Pingback: neurontin 800 pill

  516. Pingback: cheapest plaquenil

  517. Pingback: prednisone 12 mg

  518. Pingback: compra viagra

  519. Pingback: avana 200 mg

  520. Pingback: provigil where to buy

  521. Pingback: stromectol covid

  522. Pingback: combivent brand name

  523. Pingback: plaquenil for sale

  524. Pingback: azithromycin pill

  525. Pingback: stromectol for sale over the counter

  526. Pingback: online viagra cheap

  527. Pingback: viagra generic over the counter

  528. Pingback: alternatives to viagra

  529. Pingback: plaquenil

  530. Pingback: prednisone 20 tablet

  531. Pingback: cialis 20

  532. Pingback: order stromectol

  533. Pingback: 1.25 mg albuterol

  534. Pingback: viagra kaufen

  535. Pingback: zithromax 500mg

  536. Pingback: cheap generic tadalafil

  537. Pingback: generic cialis cost

  538. Pingback: cheap viagra canada

  539. Pingback: whats viagra

  540. Pingback: over the counter generic sildenafil

  541. Pingback: need prescription for dapoxetine

  542. Pingback: viagra sildenafil

  543. Pingback: hims sildenafil

  544. Pingback: sildenafil over the counter

  545. Pingback: realistic sex games

  546. Pingback: 100 mg viagra

  547. Pingback: when will there be a generic cialis

  548. Pingback: viagra for men

  549. Pingback: viagra online

  550. Pingback: sildenafil

  551. Pingback: ivermectin nz

  552. Pingback: 10mg cialis cost

  553. Pingback: herbal viagra

  554. Pingback: cialis reliable sites

  555. Pingback: who makes viagra

  556. Pingback: sildenafil pills

  557. Pingback: sildenafil 100 mg oral jelly

  558. Pingback: sildenafil price

  559. Pingback: canadian pharmacy cialis 40 mg

  560. Pingback: cialis vs viagra

  561. Pingback: cheap viagra buy online

  562. Pingback: cialis half life

  563. Pingback: sildenafil 100mg capsule

  564. Pingback: brookshire brothers pharmacy

  565. Pingback: azithromycin 250 mg tablet

  566. Pingback: herb viagra for sale

  567. Pingback: cialis copay card

  568. Pingback: cialis 20 mg instructions

  569. Pingback: average cost of viagra at cvs

  570. Pingback: cialis 5mg price cvs

  571. Pingback: how much does viagra cost at walgreens

  572. Pingback: viagra over the counter usa 2018

  573. Pingback: ivermectin 6mg tablet for lice

  574. Pingback: buy combivent

  575. Pingback: ivermectin uk

  576. Pingback: tadalafil powder

  577. Pingback: viagra prices

  578. Pingback: buy viagra online paypal

  579. Pingback: buy stromectol 3 mg

  580. Pingback: ivermectin humans

  581. Pingback: albuterol canada cost

  582. Pingback: flcc blackboard login

  583. Pingback: covid protocol

  584. Pingback: tizanidine 2mg

  585. Pingback: olumiant tablet

  586. Pingback: prices for aralen

  587. Pingback: olumiant fda

  588. Pingback: Anonymous

  589. Pingback: pharmacies

  590. Pingback: ivermectin 200mg

  591. Pingback: ivermectin 0.1 uk

  592. Pingback: stromectol prices

  593. Pingback: ivermectin cream 5%

  594. Pingback: ivermectin 3mg tab

  595. Pingback: ivermectin for humans

  596. Pingback: stromectol 3 mg tablet

  597. Pingback: ivermectin lice

  598. Pingback: ivermectin gel

  599. Pingback: where to get ivermectin

  600. Pingback: cheapest generic viagra and cialis

  601. Pingback: ivermectin in india

  602. Pingback: flccc ivermectin

  603. Pingback: frontline doctors ivermectin

  604. Pingback: ivermectin generic

  605. Pingback: ivermectin where to buy

  606. Pingback: ignition casino legal in us

  607. Pingback: why are there fewer viagra commercials now ?

  608. Pingback: buy ivermectin online

  609. Pingback: cialis price walmart

  610. Pingback: buy prednisone 5mg online

  611. Pingback: buy online

  612. Pingback: buy generic tadalafil

  613. Pingback: provigil boots pharmacy

  614. Pingback: ivermectin buy canada

  615. Pingback: generic name for ivermectin

  616. Pingback: cheap viagra online uk

  617. Pingback: cialis generic in usa

  618. Pingback: where can you buy viagra pills

  619. Pingback: ivermectin 90 mg

  620. Pingback: generic cialis online

  621. Pingback: cialis tablet

  622. Pingback: how to buy sildenafil tablets

  623. Pingback: where can i buy cialis tablets

  624. Pingback: cheap cialis canada

  625. Pingback: where to buy cialis in australia

  626. Pingback: stromectol msd

  627. Pingback: sildenafil tablets australia

  628. Pingback: sildenafil pills online purchase

  629. Pingback: se puede comprar cialis sin receta en farmacia en españa

  630. Pingback: cialis 20mg online

  631. Pingback: generic tadalafil in us

  632. Pingback: tadalafilo

  633. Pingback: prednisone 20mg tablets used

  634. Pingback: prednisone 20mg tab

  635. Pingback: buy cialis no prescription canada

  636. Pingback: online cialis prescription canada

  637. Pingback: covid antiviral drugs

  638. Pingback: 3crested

  639. Pingback: where to buy cialis over the counter

  640. Pingback: cialis prescription prices

  641. Pingback: levitra vardenafil

  642. Pingback: order ivermectin

  643. Pingback: viagra price

  644. Pingback: prednisone side effects in women

  645. Pingback: tadalafil cialis

  646. Pingback: best casino online

  647. Pingback: generic viagra cost canada

  648. Pingback: theborgata com login

  649. Pingback: buy oral ivermectin

  650. Pingback: cialis tadalafil

  651. Pingback: ivermectin goodrx

  652. Pingback: casino online gambling

  653. Pingback: ciprofloxacin coverage

  654. Pingback: hims sildenafil

  655. Pingback: cheap cialis india

  656. Pingback: what is cialis

  657. Pingback: ioban keflex

  658. Pingback: augmentin espanol

  659. Pingback: azithromycin allergies

  660. Pingback: ivermectin human dosage

  661. Pingback: cialis prescription usa

  662. Pingback: tadalafil 20 mg tadarise

  663. Pingback: how much is a cialis prescription

  664. Pingback: stromectol sale

  665. Pingback: ivermectin 15 mg

  666. Pingback: keflex pricing

  667. Pingback: stromectol brand

  668. Pingback: stromectol sale

  669. Pingback: chloromycetin

  670. Pingback: zithromax gonorrhea

  671. Pingback: ivermectin 5ml

  672. Pingback: ciprofloxacin eyedrops

  673. Pingback: ciprofloxacin toxicity

  674. Pingback: flagyl tetracycline

  675. Pingback: celebrex generic mexico

  676. Pingback: imverctin

  677. Pingback: furosemide on line no prescription

  678. Pingback: lasix online india

  679. Pingback: stromectol uk buy

  680. Pingback: ivermectin 3mg tablets price

  681. Pingback: ivermectine arrow lab

  682. Pingback: stromectol online

  683. Pingback: how much does ivermectin cost

  684. Pingback: luckyland login

  685. Pingback: ivermectin amazon

  686. Pingback: ivermectina dosis

  687. Pingback: ivermectin covid studies

  688. Pingback: side effects of ivermectin

  689. Pingback: buy ivermectin from india

  690. Pingback: ivermectin tablets for sale

  691. Pingback: ivermectin without prescription

  692. Pingback: dr pierre kory ivermectine

  693. Pingback: stromectol uk

  694. Pingback: best liquid tadalafil

  695. Pingback: stromectol sale

  696. Pingback: ivermectin 6 mg tablets

  697. Pingback: In Germany, the Humboldt Forum stirs up a colonial controversy – National Geographic - Sephari Germany

  698. Pingback: fda ivermectin

  699. Pingback: stromectol online canada

  700. Pingback: ivermectin ingredients for humans

  701. Pingback: stromectol pill

  702. Pingback: revatio

  703. Pingback: where to buy propecia online yahoo answers

  704. Pingback: can i buy propecia in canada

Kommentare sind geschlossen.